26Views
Protocol Economics: Quality, Durability & Capital Efficiency
PublicA multi-model protocol research dashboard covering peer-relative quality, fee destination, category concentration, capture durability, capital productivity, and post-exploit resilience.
Protocol quality, measured relative to peers
This dashboard joins TVL, fees, total revenue, treasury revenue, holder revenue, and supply-side revenue. The quality score is category-relative: 28% capital efficiency, 24% fee capture, 18% revenue scale, 16% run-rate stability, and 14% momentum. It is a screening model, not an investment rating.
Where each fee dollar goes
The next views reconcile multiple fee and revenue datasets into a normalized economic stack. The no-code builder can chart each metric separately, but it cannot join the components, derive the residual, normalize the mix, or classify the resulting revenue model.
Durability and changing economics
The time-series model full-joins category fees and revenue by date, rolls them into weeks, and calculates an eight-week capture average. The cross-sectional model ranks each protocol against category peers using window functions rather than a global leaderboard.
Capital productivity and operating resilience
These models join fundraising and exploit-event history to current TVL, fees, and revenue. They answer questions that require aggregation across unrelated datasets: what operating footprint followed funded capital, and which exploited protocols still retain meaningful activity?